Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science

Review articles

Patient-physician interaction education in Korea: a systematic review: Hwan Ho Lee, Yu Ra Kim, Hye Jin Park; J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2024;41(2):74-79. Published online February 5, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2023.01109

643 View
36 Download

Abstract PDF: Patient-physician interaction (PPI) is an important area in medical education, but in-depth discussions on the content of the outcome of patient-doctor education are rare. Therefore, in this study, we will systematically analyze the research on PPI education in Korea. In this study, papers searched with keywords related to PPI education from Korea’s academic journal service were targeted according to a systematic literature analysis method. The scope of the study was to include papers published in academic journals that are candidates for Korea Citation Index registration, excluding dissertations, research reports, posters, conference presentations, books, and internet materials. The content included papers targeting medical education and medical school students was set as the range. As a result of the analysis, although communication between PPI has many positive effects in the PPI in medical education at medical schools, obstacles do occur, and various ways to overcome them were suggested. Therefore, although medical interview training between patients and doctors in medical schools is necessary, it was analyzed as being based on overseas research or lacking in specific content. The core of PPI education appears to be medical interviews, and it seems necessary to discuss whether empathy or patient-centered medical care are appropriate as the main principles of PPI education in Korea. Therefore, education on the patient-doctor relationship is an important element in medical humanities and medical humanities education, and it is expected that research and education on this will progress more actively.

Evaluation research in Korean medical education: a systematic review: Hye Jin Park, Yu Ra Kim; J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2023;40(3):233-240. Published online December 5, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2022.00563

1,732 View
83 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: The purpose of this study aims to analyze research trends related to ‘evaluation’ in Korean medical education through a systematic review. This study used a systematic review method, which is a research methodology for research trends and ‘literature analysis.’ Researchers searched the Korean journal literature published until the end of December 2020 in the Korean research database with keywords related to medicine and evaluation. Thus, 5,205 cases were identified. Based on these data, 143 papers were selected through a logical screening process, requiring 1 month to complete the data search and analysis process. In terms of publications, medical journals overwhelmingly outnumbered nonmedical journals until 2015; however, after 2016, the number of papers published in nonmedical journals increased, and the number of published papers was similar to that of medical journals. In terms of evaluation-related research, research on student and program evaluations has been very active compared to that on accreditation. As the number of evaluation studies has gradually decreased over the past 10 years, preparing a plan to revitalize them in Korean medical education is necessary. Considering that the role of evaluation in education has been emphasized in recent years, research on reestablishing the concept of evaluation; developing evaluation indicators; analyzing the status of student evaluation, program evaluation, and accreditation; and deriving measures to improve medical education through evaluation is required.

Original articles

Experience of operating a medical humanities course at one medical school during the COVID-19: a retrospective study: Yu Ra Kim, Hye-won Shin, Young Hwan Lee, Seong-Yong Kim; J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2023;40(2):179-186. Published online September 23, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2022.00451

1,581 View
57 Download
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Background
This study summarizes the experience of operating a ‘Medical Humanities’ course, which was taught remotely to maintain activities and discussions at medical schools in Daegu, Korea during the sudden and unexpected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Methods
The subjects of this study were 73 first- and 79 second-grade medical students who took the medical humanities (1) and (2) courses among first- and second-grade students of Yeungnam University College of Medicine in 2020. Of the 152 students who agreed to the online survey, 123 completed the survey. Self-, environmental, and program evaluations were conducted on the study subjects, and differences according to grade and gender were analyzed.
Results
As a result of the study, a significant difference between self-evaluation and environmental evaluation was confirmed. Self-evaluation was determined to be higher in the first grade than in the second grade. The environmental evaluation showed that male students were more satisfied than female students and students generally had difficulties in the classroom environment. Of the applications used in class, the highest satisfaction was observed with KakaoTalk (Kakao Corp.) and Zoom (Zoom Video Communications Inc.). At the end of COVID-19, the students preferred online classes.
Conclusion
If the learning environment for online classes is well prepared and systematic provisions are made, such as class operations that are suitable for the subject, effective education and learning can be achieved by taking advantage of both face-to-face and online classes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Study on the Learning Environment of Medical Students in the COVID-19
Yu Ra Kim, Hye Jin Park, Saeyoon Kim
Keimyung Medical Journal.2023; 42(2): 80. CrossRef

A study on the mental health of students at a medical school during COVID-19 outbreak: a retrospective study: Yu Ra Kim, Hye Jin Park, Bon-Hoon Koo, Ji Young Hwang, Young Hwan Lee; J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2022;39(4):314-321. Published online August 16, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2022.00437

2,672 View
62 Download
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Background
In this study, the degree of anxiety, depression, and stress caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was identified, as well as the need for psychological prevention measures among medical students in the Daegu region that was designated the first special disaster area due to the spread of COVID-19.
Methods
The subjects of this study were 318 medical students in Daegu who voluntarily participated in an online test using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Impact of Event Scale-Revised Korean version. As a result of the test, risk students received immediate telephone counseling, and the effect of this telephone counseling was analyzed.
Results
There were no differences in depression, anxiety, or stress according to gender and grade. As a result of immediate telephone counseling for risk students, significant differences were found in depression, anxiety, and stress, and the counseling was found to be effective.
Conclusion
For medical students who are easily exposed to stress, the importance of psychological prevention measures and effectiveness of non-face-to-face counseling should be recognized. In the field of medical education, we must do our best to build a system that can be used immediately at the appropriate time for these programs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Study on the Learning Environment of Medical Students in the COVID-19
Yu Ra Kim, Hye Jin Park, Saeyoon Kim
Keimyung Medical Journal.2023; 42(2): 80. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search